On Basketball Brackets 2009

The conference tournaments are the opening act to March Madness. Now that they are over, many workders will have their bracket handy in their office cubicle to record that vision of the grand upset and ultimate winner. More enthusiastic fans will argue about seeds and who didn’t get invited.

I’m sure being on the committee is both rewarding and difficult. Given the 347 teams, the committee must narrow the field to 65 while working within their established rules – let alone create the actual bracket.

College sports are big … not only high interest, but also big dollar. Unlike their BCS counterparts, at least basketball produces a legitimate champion who is unquestionably recognized. However, like its gridiron counterparts, the power schools dominate the scene at the expense of the mid-majors. Basketball teams are also following football’s recipe of out-of-conference scheduling involving more home games against mid-majors in order to reach that 20-win mark.

Let’s see – How many teams outside of the non-BCS conferences received at-large invitations? Four: Xavier, Butler, Dayton, and BYU.

How many at-large teams had conference records of .500 or less? Five: Arizona, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, and USC. Sorry, if you can’t finish with a winning record in the conference, no big dance for you! Besides, are their at least five more-deserving teams?

How many #8 seeds or lower get to play close to home? One: Ohio State – such a possible reward for top-seed Louisville. Hmmm … did the inclusion of Michigan and Minnesota affect OSU’s playing site?

I remain against the conference tournaments as they give less meaning to a season. A mid-major team can dominate their conference during the season, but that one off night could keep them out of the big dance. On the other hand, their conference takes the risk by accepting sponsorship and television money for the event. Keep in mind that since there’s only so much TV time, numerous mid-major conferences adjust their tournament schedule to get the money and additional media exposure.

Meanwhile, the start of the dance is just around the corner. Although mid-majors have minimal chance of landing in the Final Four, let alone becoming a national championship, mid-majors are the ones who capture the hearts of basketball fans. When all is said and done, use the BCS model to figure out the selection process – just follow the money.

6 thoughts on “On Basketball Brackets 2009

    • Lester,
      Well said, thus why I keep saying at least college basketball has a champion. While football continues to be a mess, and no matter the similarities I draw between the brackets and the BCS, March Madness is still quite the event.

      Thanks for reading and commenting.


    • 3rd Stone … I’m not so sure about that … Although I don’t think they should be in, I’m picking them to win over Cal.

      Good luck to your team.


  1. Our hapless Razorbacks are not even close this year, seemingly, not even on the same planet. Those of you who remember the Rick Pitino days at Kentucky may also remember a fine player by the name of John Pelphrey, one of Pitino’s stars. He pursued the game with firebrand intensity. He is now our coach and we have high hopes that his winning ways will be absorbed by our players. Congratulations to other fans whose teams are ready to rock at the big dance!


    • Joe … going through rebuilding is painful as we both know. The question is when do our teams turn the corner and return to the good times.

      Meanwhile, I’ll sit and watch games for entertainment.
      Thanks Joe for your thoughts.


Comment with respect.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.