On a Game Show Analogy for the Times

The other day I was thinking about the beginning of a television show, Who Wants to be a Millionaire. The initial once-a-week phenomenon hosted by Regis Philbin was a prime-time success. As ratings soared, the network expanded to two then three, and possibly more evenings. The show eventually peaked, got scaled back, and is now a regular component for daytime viewing; but no longer a craze.

The network’s rationale is obvious – cash in on those advertising revenues when you can – a get the money when you can approach. The eventually losers in the methodology are the viewers whose interest fades due to overexposure, thus ratings and revenue subsequently fall; but the networks had a successful cash cow.

Through the years I’ve seen this happen with other shows; in the same way I’ve watched political parties whose prominence ebbs and flows. Currently, the Democrats have the majority in both chambers of Capitol Hill and occupy the White House. The same was true for Republicans not all that long ago. And of course transition periods of divided power also occur.

In any time on single party dominance, their behavior is similar to the networks – you know, get it while you can. The Democrats know they must maximize their use of the time because it won’t last – and just like the last time the Republicans dominated the power – and the time before that with the Democrats.

So during our country’s time of need, a time when we could use a patriotic grace to do what is needed – what is right – let us remember that the party in power seeks to get it while it can – but, in this case, at the citizen’s expense – and the same would be true if the other party was in power because political parties practice their mantra – party first.

5 thoughts on “On a Game Show Analogy for the Times

  1. Very interesting analogy, Afrankangle. I too have thought about the WWTBAM phenomenon…it was such a craze, then it was totally ruined because the network decided to put it on more and more often. It was no longer a novelty, so it ceased to become the topic of conversation at the proverbial watercooler. Another example is top 40 hits; sure they can be catchy and fun, but as soon as you hear My Heart Will Go On for the 1,000th time, you are ready to puke.

    However, you’ve brought something new to the table by using this analogy for politics; interesting point. It seems as if many Washington politicians are more interested than political power, than about influencing America for the better. And, in the end, what good is power for power’s sake? It’s pointless, unless used in the pursuit of the common good.

    Thanks for the excellent post,

    Chef @ 2BB


    • Chef,
      Thanks for the kind words and support. Your analogy of Top 40 hits fits well too. Unfortunately, this post didn’t get a lot of reads. Oh well.

      I recommend reading Patriotic Grace, a recent book by WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan. It’s a very interesting perspective of the gap between what we need from Washington and how Washington acts … especially in a time of need … hence the title. It’s not a long book and I found it at my local library.

      Thanks for the comment.


  2. Pingback: On Divided Government « A Frank Angle

  3. Pingback: On Obama Losing Moderates « A Frank Angle

  4. Pingback: Opinions in the Shorts: Vol. 323 – A Frank Angle

Comment with respect.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.