On Obama in Cairo

In his recent Cairo speech, President Obama attempted to reach out to Muslim nations. Although I unquestionably support his extended-hand approach, many obstacles exist.

Over 20 countries encompass this outreach. That’s 20+ countries, with 20+ cultures – some more moderate than others in terms of their interpretations to the Quran, treatment of women, views of the West, and in their beliefs toward Jews and Christians; over 20+ economies, each being differently integrated into the world economy; some with democratic governance and others not; plus many other differences. In other words, one size doesn’t fit all.

I do say this not to condemn President Obama’s efforts, but to shine light on the enormity of the task at hand; let alone it takes two to tango.

Then there are we, the Americans with many cultural differences within us – liberals and conservatives, Northerners and Southerners, Protestants and Catholics, Democrats and Republicans; East Coast, West Coast, and heartland; evangelicals, fundamentalists, and mainstreamers, supporters of a 2-state Israeli-Palestinian solution and those opposed, and who knows how many more – let alone our knowledge of Islam or lack of: What do we know? What misconceptions do we have? What do Christians, Jews, and Muslims have in common? What is the difference between a Shiite and a Sunni?

This is an example of life known as the intersection of fear and hope. Fear focuses on our own survival based on the harsh reality of the present, thus freezing us in an anti-neighborly role. On the other hand, hope is a positive movement allowing growth by reaching out. Bottom line is which path would you take?

Let us remember, it’s not all on Islamic countries as understanding and respect is important to all – we Americans included – thus the paramount need for learning so we know how to act at the intersection of fear and hope.

6 thoughts on “On Obama in Cairo

  1. Very well written Frank. I too agree with Obama’s approach but you are right that “it takes two to tango.”

    I prefer the positive and hopeful approach to the alternative. I only hope this works as well as President Obama is planning. I also hope we as a country continue to learn so that we may deal with the next intersection of fear and hope with tact and intelligence rather than brute force (although this is sometimes called for).

    Good work Frank


    • Rad,
      The speech attempted to jump-start a new relationship in a situation that is very difficult.

      Glad you appreciated the intersection of fear and hope, but the credit for that line goes to Mark Hanson, the presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

      Thanks for the comment.


  2. I really liked the speech…He was willing to go places that no other President would ever go…He was both tough and gentle…Saying some things that needed to be said…Now we have to see how everyone responds to it!


    • Beeze,
      Response to the speech is important, and on several fronts …. as I stated at the end, us too as individuals in terms of learning.

      But still … lotsa work to do!

      Thanks for the comment.


    • Tim,
      Given the speech as almost an hour, yes, there was a lot to digest. I heard him respectfully reach out, as opposed to other tactics of “we know what is best for you.”

      Thanks for the visiting and commenting!


Comment with respect.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.