Depending on one’s perspective, Charles Darwin is a lightning rod and a foundation. Opposing sides in the theology-evolution issue use him in different ways. Whereas conservative Christians describe him as an immoral, hateful atheist who is a messenger from the devil, evolution supporters refer to him as a scholar, a brilliant thinker, and even an inspiration.
Interesting how the two views of one life differ based a perspective of a forced choice that some present. In terms of his religion, Darwin faith life was filled with struggle. Below are chronological moments in Charles Darwin’s religious life. Besides, February 12th is his 208th birthday.
1809: Charles Darwin is born into a family of a father who was a religious skeptic, a Unitarian mother, and 4 siblings (3 sisters and a brother) who attended church with their mother. His paternal grandfather was a deist, as was Darwin’s brother.
1817: Darwin’s mother died. Thereafter, his older sisters took him to an Anglican church where he remained and was educated. At the time, the Anglican church had a 6-day, young-earth creationist view of the world.
1828: After several years in medical school at the University of Edinburgh, Darwin enters Cambridge University to study theology. Studies introduce him to Paley’s Natural Theology, which influenced his beliefs in a God intervening in creation.
1831: Darwin graduates from Cambridge with a theology degree, but decided not to pursue being an ordained pastor. A geology field trip initiated the thought that the earth is very old, therefore developing a view of today’s old-earth creationists with an intervening God as the designer. Later that year he begins his 5-year journey on the HMS Beagle.
1831-1836: Through his many observations across the globe, Darwin is convinced God is present in nature and that God was the intervening designer.
1836-1839: After his journey, Darwin thought deeply about biology, geology, and theology, so he spend much time writing. He rejected origins based on Genesis 1 and eventually Christianity – but not God.
1839: Marries Emma (a Unitarian) in an Anglican ceremony. They would eventually have 10 children, two of which died in infancy.
1851: Annie, his second oldest child and the “apple of her proud father’s eye” dies after an illness of several years. This devastated Darwin, and some say this greatly impacted his view of suffering.
1856: Starts writing On the Origin of the Species.
1859: On the Origin of the Species is published. In it Darwin mentions god as the Creator on multiple occasions – signally his shift from a traditional theist to a non-traditional theist with God as the creator of the evolutionary process.
1860-1861: Reflecting on reactions people had about the book, Darwin writes to a Harvard botanist, “I had no intention to write atheistically … my views are not at all necessarily atheistical.” He also admits being troubled by the suffering that occurs in nature and in the world, but reinforces a belief in design by a Creator.
1871: The Descent of Man published. While acknowledging the “highly irreligious” will denounce his work, he supports his belief in a Creator at work in designing life. “The birth both of the species and of the individual are equally parts of that grand sequence of events, which our minds refuse to accept as the result of blind chance.”
1876: Because of his struggles with suffering, he continues to question God’s existence. In his biography Darwin explains his belief in God as an intelligent designed and states, “I deserve to be called a theist.” His writings point to one who believes in a god that is not assigned to one particular religion. Later he concludes, “The mystery of the beginning of all things is not solvable by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic.”
1879: Although agnostic, Darwin writes this powerful sentence about evolution and theology in a letter: “It seems to me absurd to doubt that a man be an ardent theist and an evolutionists. …. In my extreme fluctuations, I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of God …. I think that as I grow older, but not always, that an Agnostic would be a more correct description of my state of mind.”
1882: After a difficult 3 months with health issues, Charles Darwin dies – and never an atheist. Reports of him recanting his view of evolution and proclaiming Jesus Christ as savior lack evidence, therefore untrue. He is buried in London’s Westminster Abbey (Anglican).
Embed from Getty Images
What an interesting post, Frank. I have always been fascinated with Charles Darwin. I’m surprised he thought of himself as an agnostic but can see his evolution to that belief (No pun intended) Have a great weekend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John,
So many misconceptions about the man and his work. Even before writing his first book, he knew the angst it would cause with religious circles … but it seems he was going through his own angst.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was the learning here. You da man. That is Obama’s fault as well but a good thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you kind sir.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
I think his upbringing, his theology degree, and his exposure to the workings of the natural world gave him a thorough comprehensive viewpoint few other people have ever come near. I respect his work and writings a great deal. Thanks for the post.
Happy Birthday, Chuck.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jim,
He was unquestionably educated and full of wonder about nature. Yet, his religious history also shows a bit of the personal torment he went through. Nonetheless, maybe the greatest biological thinker of all time.
LikeLike
Your post does an excellent job of summarizing Darwin’s groundbreaking life. Two of your quotes from Darwin (“I deserve to be called a theist”) and (“The mystery of the beginning of all things is not solvable by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic”) lead me to ponder the implications of Dictionary.com’s primary and secondary definitions for the word THEISM:
1. The belief in one God as the creator and ruler of the universe, without rejection of revelation (distinguished from deism).
2. Belief in the existence of a god or gods (opposed to atheism).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Tim,
Glad this post was able to energize the tumblers in your mind.
LikeLike
Enjoyed this, Frank. An educating read
LikeLiked by 1 person
Audra,
Receiving praise from a librarian is a quite the feat. 🙂 Thanks.
LikeLike
This is an interesting summary of Darwin’s life, Frank. Darwinian theory is mentioned in several of the topics I have been studying at university (why I rarely comment these days, but I’m on a uni break now 🙂 ) although it hasn’t been noted that he retained a belief in God. Darwin was an interesting and complex theorist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joanne,
Glad to see you during your break. Welcome back, and I hope classes are going well for you.
Darwin’s work is very interesting, and in some ways, ahead of his time. Interestingly, when one sees lists of great thinkers of all time, he’s the only biologist who makes this list.
There are many misconceptions not only about evolution, but also about Darwin, especially regarding his religion … so that’s the driving force for this post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brilliant post, my friend! Happy Monday and week ahead!! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Marina,
Many thanks. Many Europeans may not know that many in the US have a difficult time with evolution, let alone the person behind natural selection. His faith is one thing, thus why I did this post. Cheers to the week ahead!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was most interesting indeed! Things that make you go hmmmm
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dale,
Thanks … But now I’m wondering about your hmmmmmms.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to leave you with questions…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh my my …. cruel! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh so sorry to torment you…
I admit to being fascinated at finding out the man who intrroduced the theory of evolution struggled with his beliefs in God
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems the struggle was a constant one for the man. A question for you … A sizeable number of Americans have issues with Darwin and his work. Meanwhile, Europeans are much more accepting. What is the thought among Canadians?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quebecers had the church shoved down their throats so much, many have turned away. Other parts of Canada are way more religious. What proportion is more or less accepting is hard to say. I’ve been surrounded by those who are accepting of Darwin. Now you’ve made me question (thereby my hmmm)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks …but here’s the interesting thing .. religions are more accepting than you think .. and supporters include Roman Catholics and Anglicans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I realise and that’s why I have so much trouble answering!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So another misnomer is that one has to make a choice between the two … although that is the stance from the polarized ends.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. Polarisation causes much grief in so many situations… but let us not talk politics!!😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a political slant, but I won’t take it. I’m just saying that the polarized ends that make the most noise don’t represent the majority on this issue … and it’s not even close. Now the masses knowing this is a story in itself, and probably a series of posts in the future here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I agree with you..the noisiest are far from the voice of the masses
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interestingly … I have the stats to support it. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
… and this discussion reinforces my points to post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cool… I think? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really enjoyed reading this chronology of Darwin’s life, Frank. There is no doubt that he continues to be a polarizing figure in some circles, but I think many people with harsh pronouncements don’t really know what he believed, or the depth of his searching for a compatible relationship between his understanding of faith and his scientific study. I think his struggle with suffering, even in observing nature, is really interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Debra,
Glad you saw this post as it was the one I mentioned as you were about to leave for the Gino concert. (How was it?)
This post is such is small portion within a larger topic that involves a combination of people not knowing as well as having misconceptions based on what they think they know. Of course some of that are deliberate attempts to misinform in order to justify a position.
Meanwhile, I will have much more to say in upcoming months.
LikeLike
Fascinating and thorough Frank. So glad in my working through my favorites I didn’t miss this one. I think Darwin identification as both Theist and Agnostic is likely how many of us would see ourselves given the opportunity to really sit and think about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Val,
This was a fun post to research and put together. Interesting how many anti-evolutionists put a totally different spin on his faith – thus one of the reasons I did this.
LikeLike