On Iranian Demonstrations

People want freedom.

As the world watches the post-election events in Iran, I can’t help to think about those words that President Bush (43) echoed so many times. Yet, as we watch from this country, the political partisans align against one another as if the Iranians are mere pawns of our politics. On one side we have claims that President Obama is being “too passive” toward the Iranian events. On the other side we have President Obama proceeding with caution.

Only fools believe the State Department and the White House aren’t closely monitoring the events as we are clearly seeing a practice of how the United States government is changing its approach toward conflicts in that part of the world. With his Cairo speech of not long ago acting as an extended hand, President Obama is remaining cautious so this country is not portrayed as instigators and meddlers, especially after long-time portrayal as the Great Satin – kind of a practice-what-you-preach approach.

I think back to our own presidential election in 2000. It was hotly contested, yet no violence. Issues that took time to sort, yet there were no demonstrations. Those of us outside of Florida shook our head in amazement while others claim our nine Supreme Court justices decided the election.

Yes, President Bush was right – People want freedom. But are the Iranian demonstrations an internal or external issue? How would we have reacted if nations of the world voiced their disapproval, made demands, and wanted to get involved in 2000? Maybe being a world leader by example has more power and influence than some think.