The odds of actually seeing this take are someplace between slim and none – so, why not here? After all, these two topics are more important than ever, and are the center of numerous important issues that the candidates frequently ignore, skirt, or poorly answer.
We should note that neither political party would agree to these rules and the debate topic because they prefer rules that favor them – not the voters. Therefore, our aim is getting the answers that Americans need to hear or identifying the fraudulent candidates.
Introduction
Welcome to the aFrankAngle Theater for the Performing Arts as it hosts the Presidential Forum on Science and Technology. This first-ever event is co-sponsored by the aFrankAngle Center of Blogging Decency and the aFrankAngle Foundation for Candidate Accountability and No-Campaign-Bullshit. We’ve invited all the candidates from both major parties
First, the rules.
Rule 1) The moderator makes the rules, asks the questions, and runs the debate. Anyone disagreeing with any of the moderator’s questions, rules, or actions during the debate should always refer to Rule 1.
Rule 2) When answering the question, talk back to the audience through the moderator. For instance, start your answer by paraphrasing the question as your introductory phrase. For instance: (Q) What is your favorite color? (Ex) My favorite color is blue. Bad examples of starting an answer include (which some, maybe all, on this stage have used):
- I think a better question is ….
- Let me tell you what I think.
- I’m not going to talk about that, but I will say …
- That’s a good question, and I’m happy to be here.
- I believe the American people are looking for someone to speak the truth.
- First of all, …
Rule 3) After your answer, provide several supporting statements for your answer. (Ex) My favorite color is blue because it was the most prominent color at my grandparent’s house. I would spend time with them each summer amidst all that blue. I would go outside to work and play with all that blue sky – endless on the open plains – simply beautiful. I also resemble my grandmother, and wouldn’t you know it, I inherited her blue eyes. Those are the main reasons why blue is my favorite color.
Rule 4) Focus on answering the question and staying on topic. If you babble, go off topic, criticize the current administration or any fellow candidate, the moderator will turn off your microphone and enclose you in the Cone of Silence. On the third offense, you will be removed from the stage in an unexpected manner as a trap door, hooked cane, or a vaporizer.
Rule 5) If you answer the question to the moderator’s satisfaction, there will be no follow-up questions.
Also note that we prepared as many questions as possible without an introductory premise because we want to avoid leading questions and bias. The audience should know that the candidates did not receive the questions in advance, however, received a list of topics as science/science processes, evolution, genetics, health, technology, energy, and the environment.
Topic 1:Science
Q1) What is science?
Q2) Give examples of good science and bad science – but each example of one requires an example of the other.
Q3) Does science have limits on its area of study?
Q4) How do you define a scientific theory?
Q5) Is it acceptable for elected officials to hold back or alter scientific reports if they conflict with their own views, and how will you balance scientific information with politics and personal beliefs in your decision-making?
Q6) Do science and religion compete against each other?
Q7) Explain why Intelligent Design and 7-day Creationism should or should not get time in the science classroom.
Topic 2: Genetics
Q8) The field of genetics has exploded possibilities. What is the right policy balance between genetic advances and potential risks?
Q9) What is your position on government regulation and funding of stem cell research?
Q10) Assuming health insurance companies cannot deny health insurance, is the information from genetic testing/screening the same as a pre-existing condition?
Q11) How should we use and not use genetically modified plants?
Q12) Scientist created seedless watermelons by chemically changing the chromosome number in watermelons. Should seedless watermelons be banned?
Topic 3: Health
Q13) How do you see science, research, and technology contributing to improved health and quality of life?
Q14) How do you protect citizens from pandemics?
Q15) What role do vaccines have in our society today?
Q16) Should a public school and a private school have the authority to deny admission of a student whose parents decided not to vaccinate their children?
Q17) In a time of fiscal restraint, how do you secure more funding toward combating mental illness?
Q18) Should the Federal government financially fund research in science topics as health and energy?
Topic 4: Technology
Q19) Should the internet be considered a public utility?
Q20) How can science and technology spur innovation?
Q21) In an era of budget cutting, how can promote research while reducing spending on research?
Q22) What role does science and technology play in national security?
Topic 5: Energy and the Environment
Q23) Water is necessary. Should the Federal government provide financial assistance to arid states and/or states with considerable droughts?
Q24) What role do alternative energy resources have in our society?
Q25) What role does the United States have in the global community regarding climate change?
Q26) Explain 3 concerns you have about the climate change issue.
Q27) In the recent nuclear negotiations with Iran, why or why not should physicists be on the negotiating team?
Q28) Would you abolish the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)? If not, why not? If so, how would environmental regulations be protected and enforced.
Topic: Questions From the Audience
Because all the candidates have been removed from the stage for repeated rule violations, let’s bring back all of them because it’s time for questions by the audience.
What questions do you have for the candidates? (Caution to questioners: Respectfully ask your question in nonpartisan manner; plus the question is to all candidates, not a specific candidate.)
A reminder to the candidates. Let’s see if you’ve learned anything about answering questions in a debate. The rules still apply, and to see if you’ve learned anything, no leniency.
Mr. Producer, is the buzzer ready?
A Frank Angle 